School uniforms debate

Advocates on both sides of the issue raise important issues. Nor should a dramatic change in educational philosophy be altered without vigorous debate. Nevertheless, uniform requirements are the growing trend in education and their benefits are supported by research and by school staff around the country.

School uniforms cons

In order to fully understand the present day debate about school uniforms, it is necessary to understand the history of school uniforms in the United States.

It is widely believed that only private and religious schools ever required uniforms or dress codes. This is not true. Up until the middle of the nineteen seventies the majority of public schools had either uniform requirements or dress codes.

School uniforms debate

Young men were required to wear solid colored slacks usually in gray or khaki or school uniforms good or bad the school colors. They had to wear dress shirts tucked in with a belt. Young women were required to wear dresses or skirts to the knee with button up blouses or sweaters. Full slips were required as were saddle shoes and flats. School dress codes were challenged during the mid-seventies not because they limited self-expression but because they were sexist.

Dresses require more care and prevent common activities like running, jumping and playing on the jungle-gym. By fewer than 2 percent of public schools maintained any type of dress code. Less than two decades later, public schools began to bring back uniforms and dress codes.

The primary difference is that modern dress codes apply equally to all students. It can be costly to buy school uniforms. Some schools specify a certain manufacturer or store to ensure uniformity, making it harder to find competitive pricing. Other schools may require a variety of uniforms, some for daily wear, more formal uniforms for special occasions, and yet another outfit school uniforms cons gym class. Kids are very specific about what they are comfortable wearing. Some kids are sensitive to certain materials while others are opposed to buttons, zippers, and restrictive clothing.

Some children are also uncomfortable wearing certain styles of clothing. Clothes that are designed to be worn by all shapes and sizes of student fit no one really well. Children in uncomfortable outfits are unlikely to learn much. Headteachers at several US schools report lower levels of violence and crime after uniforms were introduced. Uniform also helps makes schools safer as it makes intruders much easier to spot.

Anyone not in uniform can easily be seen and reported. Uniforms can actually lead to more violence, as they make students from rival schools much more obvious in the street or on the bus. In areas with lots of children from different backgrounds such as British cities it is common to consult parents and the local community.

For example, Muslim girls can be allowed to wear loose long trousers and tops in school colours, instead of the skirts or dresses worn by other female students.

For example, Sikh boys, Orthodox Jews and Islamic girls all express their religious beliefs through the way they dress, and uniform stops them doing this. In particular, school uniforms are often not modest enough in covering the female body to suit Muslims. Taking away this freedom of religious expression can also lead parents to choose private faith schools, limiting integration and the mixing of different cultures.

When you make Islamic, and Sikh children wear uniforms you violate their identity and their religious code. Young people feel pressure to dress in the latest thing and not to wear the same outfit often.

This often leads their parents to spend hundreds of dollars on clothes each year. With uniform taking away this pressure, there is usually a much smaller overall cost for the parents. Families who are hard-up can often get help with the cost of uniform, or buy it second-hand.

For these reason school uniforms cons often like uniform. At some schools it is parents groups that start campaigns to introduce it. Special clothes like uniforms are only produced in small quantities, and so are more costly than normal clothes.

Often, they can only be bought from one or two special shops, which also pushes the price up. The cost of uniform often means that parents dislike it and it can lead to a bad relationship between them and the school.

Fried, Suellen, and Paula Fried. Evans and Co. Brunsma, David L. Viadero, Debra. Schools cite benefits of student uniforms, but researchers see little evidence of effectiveness. Help with college paper writing Flipboard Email.

Melissa Kelly. Education Expert. Melissa Kelly, M. Updated February 18, Some of the reason offered to support school uniforms are the following:.

Preventing gang colors, etc. Reducing distractions for students Instilling a sense of community Helping schools recognize those who do not belong on campus. Some of the arguments made against uniforms include:. Students and parents argue that uniforms violate their freedom of expression. Some students might choose to express their individuality through other means such as body piercing which is harder to regulate.

Order by newest oldest recommendations.

School uniforms the good

Show 25 25 50 All. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. Loading comments… Trouble loading?According to a study by the National Center for Education Statistics, school uniforms are required at fifty-three percent of schools where three-quarters of students are eligible for free or reduced lunch.

But, of schools where fewer than a quarter of students are so eligible, only four per cent require uniforms. These uniforms have become a rich revenue source for kiddie-clothing companies like French Toast, which has a verbose Web site dedicated to their magical properties.

In Silicon Valley, on Ivy League campuses, and even in a growing number of white-shoe firms, the rule is to dress down. While once upon a time each profession had its uniform-the gray-flannel suit, the white coat-today, the most successful people wear what they want, especially in the more creative industries. It has aggressively formed partnerships with school systems, often becoming their main uniform purveyor, and school uniforms the good has helped fund some of the questionable research adduced to show that uniforms improve schools.

When independent researchers have tried to quantify such claims, they have had mixed results. He may be right. And, if uniforms are viewed positively by students, parents, and administrators alike-as they are-then it can seem precious to object to them. But, so school uniforms cons as the evidence for these claims is thin, Masters thesis math am more concerned about what we know to be true: that uniforms are yet one more way that the surveillance of the un-powerful-the poor, people of color, and that great unheard group of the young-has become increasingly acceptable.

However the issue is not clear-cut, as there are strong cases on both sides. Should schools have uniforms? School uniforms offer many benefits, such as an increase in school pride and a sense of unity and belonging among students. Similarly, uniforms in school bring the focus back to academics and away from 'the trendiest outfit of the week.

Why School Uniforms Are a Bad Idea

They come in white blouses. They come essay about a friend plaid skirts or jumpers. They come in pleated pants, navy or khaki. They are all made of durable fabric. They come in all sizes.

They are school uniforms. Over the past twenty years, school uniforms have become a big business. Uniforms used at schools can range from the formal to the informal.

Some schools that have implemented them have chosen what one usually thinks of in connection to private or parochial schools: nice school uniforms the good and white shirts for boys, jumpers and white shirts for girls. However, most public schools are turning to something more casual and more acceptable to parents and students: khakis or jeans and knit shirts of varying colors.

The latter appears to be more affordable too because they can be used outside of school. Many school districts that have implemented uniforms have provided some sort of financial assistance for families that can not afford the extra expense. The arguments for school uniforms hinge on their effectiveness in practice. Anecdotal information from administrators in schools that have implemented uniform policies point to the fact that they do have a positive effect on discipline and the school.

Note that all of the following were from middle schools. However, administrators point out that uniforms were only one of several reforms made, along with class size reduction, core courses, and standards-based pedagogy.

They had also not had a reported incident of theft. As a final example from Baltimore, Maryland, Rhonda Thompson, an official from a middle school that has a voluntary policy noticed a "sense of seriousness about work.

However, it can be said that something has changed to make the officials take notice. We can not discount the coincidence of school uniforms with these changes either. It is representation the community. It is easy to point out different people. The argument is that children today are lacking in self-discipline because parents refuse to discipline them.

This makes it more difficult on the teacher who has to deal with classes of students at a time. Reduces Fighting and Violence: Schools report that school uniforms decrease fighting and violence that arise out of School uniforms were originally created for poor children; however, over time, schools saw uniforms as a school uniforms cons to bring students together.

Why schools shouldn't have school uniforms.

There has been debate whether uniforms improve academic success while reducing affiliation of violence. There is opinion and study that indicate no correlation between school uniforms and academic achievement; however, there were come correlation between school uniforms and student behavior.

Among many concerns is the cost of uniformsespecially for a multiple child household. It was not until the 19th Century that the great English public schools began school uniforms debate uniforms and even later for them to be widely accepted at state schools --especially state This theory makes these assumptions: 1.

Gases are made up of particles with no defined volume but with a defined mass. In other words their volume is miniscule compared to the distance between themselves and other molecules. Gas particles undergo no intermolecular attractions or repulsions. This assumption implies that the particles possess no potential energy and thus their total energy is simply equal to their kinetic energies.


Hauptmenü